Thursday, June 27, 2013
Pesky news for parents... watching TV can actually IMPROVE your child's schoolwork
Is the batty Baroness Greenfield listening?
Parents have for years rationed the amount of television their children can watch in the belief that too much will scramble their offspring’s brains.
Now a study suggests the opposite is true – that children who are glued to the screen for hours a day can significantly outperform classmates who watch considerably less.
It also found that other family rules imposed by parents hoping to boost their children’s academic prowess, such as insisting on regular bed or meal times, make only a relatively small difference.
While TV has been consistently blamed for diminishing children’s brain power, University of London academics found those who watched three or more hours a day were three months ahead of those who watched less than an hour a day.
The report’s lead author Dr Alice Sullivan, senior academic at the university’s Institute of Education, admitted the results, particularly those regarding television, were ‘contrary to expectations’.
She added that the educational value of children’s television had been ‘underestimated’. ‘It may also help expose some children to a broader vocabulary than they get at home,’ Dr Sullivan said.
Their findings were part of an analysis that set out to examine claims made by politicians, including David Cameron, and others that parenting skills were more important than social background in determining how well children do at school and in later life.
It used test results for 11,000 British seven-year-olds tracked since birth as part of a long-term project called the Millennium Cohort Study.
In tests comparing youngsters of the same social class, regular meal times conferred only a six-week advantage in terms of reading and writing skills, while set bedtimes gave only a two-month head start.
Overall, the analysis, published in the journal Sociology, concluded ‘social class and in particular parents’ education were the dominant factors’ in determining how well children fared.
It found those with parents in stable, well-paid jobs were more than a year ahead than those whose parents work in unskilled or semi-skilled positions.
How popping aspirin can give some people asthma for life; Life-threatening allergies to antibiotics and general anaesthetics are also on the rise
On the day of her grandmother's funeral, Jacqui Sanders took an aspirin to cope with a painful headache. She had used the drug before, and after taking the pill she waited for her pounding head to abate.
Instead, ten minutes later she started to feel breathless. Initially, she blamed it on the stress of the day. However, it soon became clear it was not her emotions causing the problems, but an asthma attack. Jacqui had been diagnosed with a mild form of the condition a few years earlier, but was now experiencing a full-blown attack.
'I was rushed to my local surgery, where I was quickly given a nebuliser, but it was frightening,' says the 44-year-old mother-of-two from Ruislip, North London.
She'd previously suffered another severe attack when she had taken an aspirin. After the second attack, her GP warned she might be allergic to aspirin and advised her to avoid aspirin and ibuprofen, as people are often allergic to both.
Allergies to painkillers such as ibuprofen and aspirin are common, say experts, and can develop in adulthood, often among people who have taken these painkillers for years without any problems.
They're not the only drugs that can cause problems - allergies to antibiotics, which affect about 10 per cent of people, are also on the rise, as are reactions to general anaesthetics. The latter can be life-threatening.
'We see a lot of drug allergy patients and it's increased over recent years,' says Dr Pamela Ewan, consultant allergist from Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge. 'They can come out of the blue. People have usually happily taken the drugs for years and then suddenly develop problems.'
She attributes the increase partly to greater awareness among GPs, but also to the rise in the number of pills we are popping throughout our life. This is a particular problem with antibiotics, as the risk of allergy increases with exposure - the more of the drug you take, the more you are likely to develop an allergy.
Dr Ewan says: 'There has been far too much misuse of antibiotics, with too many handed out by doctors. Not only does this lead to superbugs but it may have contributed to more people developing allergic reactions to them.'
The antibiotics she commonly sees reactions to are penicillin, erythromycin and cephalosporins. These are commonly used for chest, ear and throat infections, tonsillitis and sinusitis.
Allergies occur when the antibiotics send the immune system into overdrive, causing it to wrongly assume the antibiotics are a foreign invader. This triggers cells of the immune system called mast cells to release histamine. This chemical causes symptoms such as rashes, swelling of the face and airways, and breathing difficulties.
In most cases, antibiotic allergies trigger a rash, usually across the body. However, in severe cases they can trigger anaphylactic shock, a more severe reaction where the patient's airways can swell and they struggle to breathe; their blood pressure also drops dangerously low.
The body's reaction to ibuprofen and aspirin is slightly different, says Dr Ewan. 'Ibuprofen is a common allergy - we see a lot of it. This often causes facial swelling and breathing difficulties, usually starting within a few minutes to an hour later, but is unlikely to cause a rash.'
Doctors are unsure exactly how ibuprofen triggers a reaction. The painkiller, together with aspirin and the painkiller diclofenac, are part of a group of drugs called non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
In people who have a reaction, the drugs seem to trigger the release of inflammatory molecules called leukotriene, which in high levels cause swelling.
It's not clear if taking lots of ibuprofen throughout life makes an allergy more likely, but 'you'll be unlikely to get ibuprofen allergy the first time you take it - most people who develop an allergy have taken it a few times before,' says Dr Ewan.
Although the immune system can react to NSAIDs, patients can often continue to take other painkillers such as paracetamol or codeine without any problems, and many can also take another form of NSAIDs called COX-2 inhibitors, which work differently in the body.
However, while these patients are able to take other painkillers, some can be with left with lifelong asthma, triggered after their first allergic reaction. This is called aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, and affects about 10 per cent of the country's 5.4 million asthmatics - half never had asthma before.
'It tends to affect more women than men, suggesting hormones are playing a role, and around half of sufferers report they had a cold beforehand,' says Dr Sophie Farooque, allergist from Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
This raises the possibility that a cold or flu is somehow knocking the immune system out of kilter, causing it to over-react when it next encounters aspirin or ibuprofen.
Doctors are also seeing a rise in allergies to general anaesthetics. These are rapid and life-threatening - within minutes of delivering a general anaesthetic a patient often goes into anaphylactic shock.
Dr Ewan says: 'Once the anaesthetic is administered, a patient's blood pressure drops through the floor and their heart may even stop.'
Although cases are still rare, the rise may well be due to the more complex anaesthetics that medics use in surgery. According to the Royal College of Anaesthetists, the NHS gives three million general anaesthetics a year.
'General anaesthetics are more complex than they were 20 years ago - people used to be given one or two drugs but now they are given a cocktail or up to seven drugs, including antibiotics, painkillers and anti-sickness drugs,' explains Dr Ewan.
Studies suggest only a third of such allergies are due to the anaesthetic drug itself - two-thirds are due to the other drugs. And similar to other drug allergies, people suddenly develop an allergy to general anaesthetic.
Michele Adams is all too familiar with this situation. The 46-year-old from Bushey, Hertfordshire, had a trouble-free general anaesthetic eight years ago to have a mole removed.
However, when she had a general anaesthetic last March for a hysteroscopy, where surgeons use a thin telescope to examine the lining of the womb, it was a different story.
'I was meant to be under for an hour, but four hours later they were still trying to bring me round. I had an anaphylactic reaction the minute the anaesthetic went into my arm. 'My blood pressure plummeted, I went blue and nearly had a cardiac arrest.
'I was told it was a close call,' says the married mother-of-two, who has her own recruitment firm. Michele spent the night in hospital and two weeks at home recovering.
She says: 'I felt exhausted. I recognised the feeling as five years earlier I'd suffered an anaphylactic shock to the antibiotic trimethoprim, which I took for a urine infection. Then eight months after I had a similar reaction to cough medicine. I'd never suffered problems before.'
Unfortunately, there is no way of predicting who will react, but Dr Farooque adds that allergists do an assessment of cases to identify the medication that triggered the reaction to ensure it doesn't happen again. In Michele's case, it was the muscle relaxant given with the general anaesthetic.
Dr Farooque says there is a shortage of drug-allergy clinics where people can have their allergies properly diagnosed and other safe drugs suggested.
And without specialist help, patients often don't realise what drugs are safe for them to take.
To lower the risk of developing allergies in the first place, Dr Ewan advises: 'Don't take drugs unless you are sure you need them.'
Michele adds: 'I don't even touch vitamins now.'
Posted by jonjayray at 12:09 AM